KK: Let’s discuss a related topic that is often a bit confusing for providers: Maintenance of Licensure (MOL). Some are wondering how it differs from Maintenance of Certification (MOC), but my specific question for you is regarding the frustration that docs have about MOC. Is this really a process that fosters quality of care, lifelong learning, and being a better, competent provider? Or is this just extra expense for providers and an intrusion into their practice?
Explore This Issue
ACEP Now: Vol 34 – No 06 – June 2015The third and final thing is that we are working doggedly to improve physician professional satisfaction and practice sustainability. We are trying to find out about things that make doctors happy and things that make them sad and
frustrated.
SS: There’s a perception among the licensure and certifying boards that there is a need for the public to know and be reassured that their physicians are engaged in lifelong learning and self-assessment throughout their careers and that they’re achieving board certification. A license is not an anointment until death. It is one step in a journey that is your lifelong professional practice. Now, we can agree or disagree on whether that is the case, but it is their belief that the public is requiring this, and so they have moved forward with these different paradigms.
The board-certifying bodies are way out ahead, and the licensure boards are not, but the concern is that only 70 to 80 percent of physicians in the United States are board certified. This means that if you are licensed but not board certified, the assertion can be made that you have no expectation to demonstrate continuing competency because you’re not subject to a specialty board and its requirements. Once you get your license, a lot of times, as long as you send in your check, you get to keep it unless you get into trouble with the board. Some in the licensure community have said, “We have to come up with some way to address that part of the population that is not board certified.” So MOC does not equal MOL, nor does MOL equal MOC, but MOC, being a robust program to ensure the lifelong self-assessment and competency of physicians, certainly should stand in fulfillment of anything that would be required for MOL. They are very different programs, and MOL, I would say, is more intended to make sure there is some base floor of safety because licensure does not guarantee excellence, it only increases the likelihood of minimum competency. Board certification may directionally foster some aspect of
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 | Single Page
2 Responses to “AMA President Dr. Steven Stack Discusses Licensure, Certification”
July 6, 2015
Louise B Andrew MD JDThank you, Kevin, for bringing this (MOL,MOC) topic up and Steve, for your very clear, rational and non partisan explanation of the players and issues. From my perspective, the Dermatologists are only the tip of the iceberg. Lots of other specialty societies and, remarkably, more than a third of state medical associations are questioning this ostensibly (according to ABIM) “publically demanded” accountability by recertification (since most of the public does not even know what board certification is); and so far NO evidence has been advanced by ANYONE that MOC programs do or even can improve quality of care. So this issue is big, and can only get bigger, and it is something that every specialty needs to address rather than just forcing it down, or expecting our practitioners to blindly accept it as the way things must or should be. I do hope ACEP will take up the challenge in a meaningful way. Council?
October 8, 2015
American Board of Anesthesiology Moves to Continuous Maintenance of Certification - ACEP Now[…] September, the American Board of Anesthesiology (ABA) announced the details of its redesigned Maintenance of Certification (MOC) program, known as MOCA […]