Logo

Log In Sign Up |  An official publication of: American College of Emergency Physicians
Navigation
  • Home
  • Multimedia
    • Podcasts
    • Videos
  • Clinical
    • Airway Managment
    • Case Reports
    • Critical Care
    • Guidelines
    • Imaging & Ultrasound
    • Pain & Palliative Care
    • Pediatrics
    • Resuscitation
    • Trauma & Injury
  • Resource Centers
    • mTBI Resource Center
  • Career
    • Practice Management
      • Benchmarking
      • Reimbursement & Coding
      • Care Team
      • Legal
      • Operations
      • Quality & Safety
    • Awards
    • Certification
    • Compensation
    • Early Career
    • Education
    • Leadership
    • Profiles
    • Retirement
    • Work-Life Balance
  • Columns
    • ACEP4U
    • Airway
    • Benchmarking
    • Brief19
    • By the Numbers
    • Coding Wizard
    • EM Cases
    • End of the Rainbow
    • Equity Equation
    • FACEPs in the Crowd
    • Forensic Facts
    • From the College
    • Images in EM
    • Kids Korner
    • Medicolegal Mind
    • Opinion
      • Break Room
      • New Spin
      • Pro-Con
    • Pearls From EM Literature
    • Policy Rx
    • Practice Changers
    • Problem Solvers
    • Residency Spotlight
    • Resident Voice
    • Skeptics’ Guide to Emergency Medicine
    • Sound Advice
    • Special OPs
    • Toxicology Q&A
    • WorldTravelERs
  • Resources
    • ACEP.org
    • ACEP Knowledge Quiz
    • Issue Archives
    • CME Now
    • Annual Scientific Assembly
      • ACEP14
      • ACEP15
      • ACEP16
      • ACEP17
      • ACEP18
      • ACEP19
    • Annals of Emergency Medicine
    • JACEP Open
    • Emergency Medicine Foundation
  • About
    • Our Mission
    • Medical Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Advisory Board
    • Awards
    • Authors
    • Article Submission
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise
    • Subscribe
    • Privacy Policy
    • Copyright Information

Readers Respond: How Not to Miss Posterior Circulation Stroke

By John Bedolla, MD, FACEP; Roya Caloia, DO, FACEP; and Amer Aldeen, MD, FACEP | on July 6, 2024 | 0 Comment
Break Room Opinion
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version
Break Room

We disagree with the recommendation to use the HINTS Exam as the gold standard for detecting posterior stroke from the April article titled, “How not to miss posterior circulation stroke.”1 The usefulness of the HINTS exam is limited to patients who have underlying nystagmus, which represents less than a quarter of patients with posterior stroke. Instead, we advocate for use of the the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) combined with a test of skew and a test of gait to screen for stroke in patients presenting with dizziness, vertigo, ataxia, and imbalance.

You Might Also Like
  • How Not To Miss Posterior Circulation Stroke
  • The Challenges of Posterior Circulation Ischemic Stroke
  • How to Recognize Posterior Strokes
Explore This Issue
ACEP Now: Vol 43 – No 07 – July 2024

Problems with HINTS

  1. The HINTS exam requires underlying nystagmus.2 In the setting of a patient with nystagmus, a normal response to the head impulse test (defined as the subject being able to keep eyes on target) can be sensitive for stroke.
  2. Over 75 percent of patients with posterior stroke do not present with nystagmus so the HINTS exam cannot be used.3
  3. The interrater reliability of the HINTS exam is, at best, moderate, and requires significant training to perform.4,5

NIHSS: An Underrated Screen for Posterior Stroke

There is a widespread misconception that NIHSS is insensitive for posterior stroke. In fact, NIHSS is highly sensitive for stroke, because it contains multiple elements that directly test the brainstem, cerebellum, and occipital region.6 The sensitivity of detecting a stroke approaches or surpasses that of diffusion weighted MRI in the early phase, and unlike the HINTS exam, it is a useful screen in all patients with posterior stroke symptoms, not just those with nystagmus.6,7,8

It is important to remember that the NIHSS was originally developed to quantify all stroke types, not just middle cerebral artery strokes. It is intended to capture as much functional and testable brain volume as possible, and redundant or unreliable elements were removed. Thus, it is applicable to interior circulation as well as posterior circulation strokes by its very design.9

Additionally, the NIHSS is the most commonly used screen for acute stroke and the majority of emergency clinicians know its elements and can perform the NIHSS with a high interrater reliability between emergency clinicians and neurologists.10

What Are the Gaps in the NIHSS?

The lack of balance testing has been noted as the most common reason for posterior strokes with NIHSS of zero. The authors thus recommend adding a test of truncal stability, which can also be tested with gait.11

The NIHSS does not include a test of skew, which can be an important sign of posterior stroke. It is the most easily performable section of the HINTS exam and is applicable even when no nystagmus is present.

Pages: 1 2 3 | Single Page

Topics: ClinicalCritical CareDizzinessposterior circulation strokeStroke

Related

  • Why the Nonrebreather Should be Abandoned

    December 3, 2025 - 0 Comment
  • What Can a Patient’s Eyes Tell Us About Concussions?

    October 23, 2025 - 0 Comment
  • Non-Invasive Positive Pressure Ventilation in the Emergency Department

    October 1, 2025 - 0 Comment

Current Issue

ACEP Now: December 2025 (Digital)

Read More

No Responses to “Readers Respond: How Not to Miss Posterior Circulation Stroke”

Leave a Reply Cancel Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


*
*


Wiley
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy
  • Terms of Use
  • Advertise
  • Cookie Preferences
Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 2333-2603