Many hospitals in the country operate at capacity, and many patients are boarded in the emergency department. Although there are many ED-based flow initiatives, virtually none of these address the most significant impediment to flow: boarding of admitted patients in the emergency department due to lack of inpatient beds. Only a few interventions really have any lasting and significant impact on boarding and capacity.
Explore This Issue
ACEP Now: Vol 35 – No 11 – November 2016This is one of a series of interviews that highlight dramatically effective interventions to reduce boarding and crowding. Eugene Litvak, PhD, is a world-renowned expert in hospital flow who made the remarkable discovery that our problem with capacity is driven in large part by elective scheduling, not by ED admissions. We sat down to discuss his experiences tackling the issue of hospital crowding.
Participants
PV: This is one of a series discussing hospital and ED crowding and its impact on patient safety, finance, and staffing. How did you get into the whole arena of hospital capacity and flow?
EL: I came to this country in 1988 from the former Soviet Union. I already had dozens of publications in the United States, and many of my colleagues recommended that I should go anywhere but health care because in this industry, efficiency is not a goal; there is no interest to increase efficiency. That was a red flag for me. I started doing some limited consulting at hospitals and started trying to learn the environment at the hospital, working with the frontline people, ie, nurses, physicians, etc. At that point, I met Dr. Michael Long, an anesthesiologist. At that point, the question that we were trying to address was, what happens with hospitals overcrowding? We found that at the same time hospitals are getting more and more overcrowded, the hospitals’ census and bed occupancy experienced large fluctuations. My initial belief was that everything stemmed from the emergency department. There are two main portals to any hospital. Emergency departments are responsible for over 50 percent of all admissions, and there are elective admissions, mostly surgical, typically responsible for up to 30–35 percent of admissions, the remaining admissions being medical referrals, transfers, etc.
2 Responses to “To Reduce Emergency Department Boarding and Hospital Crowding, Look Beyond the ED”
November 29, 2016
Kurt KnochelOn October 18, 2016 Cincinnati Children’s hospital board of trustees approved construction to increase beds by 33%. Here is link: http://www.cincinnati.com/story/news/2016/11/10/cincinnati-childrens-boost-beds-33/93598474/
This directly contradicts the interview.
December 8, 2016
Eugene Litvak, PhDThe following three links contain the relevant data:
1. “Improvements in efficiency have boosted our capacity by the equivalent of a $100 million, 100-bed expansion and increased income from treatment of patients by even more” at http://www.jointcommissioninternational.org/assets/1/14/MPF09_Sample_Chapter.pdf (PDF,
page 111).
2. “No waiting: A simple prescription that could dramatically improve hospitals — and American health care” at http://www.boston.com/bostonglobe/ideas/articles/2009/08/30/a_simple_change_could_dramatically_improve_hospitals_ndash_and_american_health_care
3. “James Anderson, adviser to the president at Cincinnati Children’s Hospital, said IHO helped that hospital improve revenues by 34 percent and avoid spending $100 million on a planned patient tower it no longer needed. Anderson, the hospital’s former president and CEO, said waiting times in the ER and OR also dropped.” Available at ttp://www.chicagotribune.com/lifestyles/health/sc-eugene-litvak-health-0504-20160502-story.html
As you can see from the above materials, these changes have been implemented 10 years ago and saved $100 million in avoided capital cost alone. I would assume patient volume increased since then. I would be unreasonable to state that this (or any other) intervention eliminates bed needs FOREVER.