The differences in training, competencies, and scope of practice among physicians and between physicians and non-physicians must be clearly defined and delineated when it comes to acute, unscheduled care. There remains much debate, even among ourselves, on the establishment of minimum standards for education, training, and competence of EM NPs and EM PAs. However, standards must not be misconstrued as training a non-physician practitioner to replace the physician.
Explore This Issue
ACEP Now: Vol 40 – No 05 – May 2021It is unacceptable to have an emergency department that is not led and staffed in real time by a board-certified emergency physician with sufficient time to oversee the department and engage with patients.
ACEP and our chapters continue to advocate strongly at national and state levels against independent practice of NPs and PAs in emergency care. At no point should the role of the emergency physicians be performed by an independently practicing non-physician practitioner.
- Set the standards for emergency medicine so every patient has access to a board-certified emergency physician
Every patient, no matter their zip code, should receive the same high-quality care when they need acute, unscheduled care to improve overall patient outcomes and as a matter of equity. ACEP has developed accreditation programs in ultrasound, geriatric emergency departments, and pain and addiction care emergency departments. We believe the time is right to explore the merit, feasibility, and operationalization of an emergency department accreditation program that categorizes emergency departments. Similar to the American College of Surgeons’ Trauma Centers, there should be a “gold standard” that patients should expect from their emergency department and from those who are providing the care. We believe every patient seeking emergency care should have access to a board-certified emergency physician. We support board-certified emergency physicians as the decisionmakers regarding staffing within emergency departments specific to physicians, NPs, and PAs.
- Broaden the umbrella to expand emergency medicine physician scope of practice
As evidenced by the many sections within ACEP, the skill-defined practice of an emergency physician is already broad. There is opportunity to deploy systemic solutions around what many emergency physicians already do: observation medicine, acute psychiatric emergencies, EMS medicine, and telehealth, among others. It is important to continue research in these and other emergency medicine practices to document improved quality of care and patient outcomes when care is provided and/or led by board-certified emergency physicians. Opportunities exist to create new or evolve current focused-practice designations toward formalizing additional EM subspecialties—disaster medicine, community health (public health), health care administration, informatics, pain management and addiction, telehealth, emergency psychiatry, and others.
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 | Single Page
3 Responses to “Workforce Considerations: ACEP’s Commitment to You and Emergency Medicine”
April 21, 2021
Johnny the EM guySo if I understand this correctly you want to restrict the pipeline (residency) of future EM physicians, restrict independent practice by mid-level providers, while simultaneously admitting there aren’t enough EM physicians in rural communities.
I am curious as to how you reconcile these obviously opposing goals?
You cannot force EM physicians into rural practices or hospitals. Nor can you force private corporate hospital system to pay rural EM physicians more in order to lure them there.
April 24, 2021
Eric sI don’t think that stopping the proliferation of emergency residencies is enough. All existing residencies will have to cut down on spots (perhaps 20-25%) because it is unreasonable to close some down. There are too many EM docs. The corporate jobs are already lowering pay because they can because there is a surplus. The only way to protect us and allowing us to work is to cut the surplus.
April 25, 2021
Robert McNamara, MDThis is an excellent document with great suggestions. To extend some of the themes above let me plead that the ACEP also endorse two items very closely aligned with the views stated here:
1) Ensure business interests are not superseding the needs of our patients.
2) Declare it unacceptable to have the contract for emergency services held by a lay for profit corporation. (this of course gives them the power to make staffing decisions)
Each of these goals can be obtained by advocating for enforcement of existing prohibitions on the corporate practice of medicine and by seeking such regulations where they do not exist or restoring those that have been weakened. It is for our patients after all.