The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) requires all eligible professionals (EPs) to successfully report on at least nine measures covering at least three National Quality Strategy (NQS) domains during 2015 to avoid Physician Quality Reporting System (PQRS) penalties. CMS also recognizes that many clinicians may not have nine measures available to report, so they have devised the Measure Applicability Validation (MAV) program that will allow clinicians to avoid the PQRS penalties while reporting fewer than nine measures or fewer than three quality domains.
How Does the MAV Work?
If an eligible professional reports fewer than nine measures (or three domains), CMS will evaluate the EP’s claims to see if there were any other measures that the EP had at least 15 opportunities to report on during the year, yet they did not report the measure(s). CMS will only look for other reportable measures that belong to the same MAV clusters as the measures already being reported by that clinician. MAV clusters are defined differently depending on the method of reporting/PQRS data submission: claims-based or registry-based.
What Are Cross-Cutting Measures?
In addition to reporting at least nine measures across three NQS domains, if the clinician has at least one face-to-face patient encounter during the year, at least one of their reported measures must come from a short list of “cross-cutting” measures defined by CMS. Successfully reporting nine measures, across three domains, including one cross-cutting measure, satisfies the 2015 PQRS reporting requirements.
Potential Measures for Emergency Care
PQRS Number | NQS Domain | Quality Measure Title | Reporting Mechanism | MAV Cluster |
---|---|---|---|---|
PQRS 54 | Clinical effectiveness | Emergency medicine: 12-lead electrocardiogram performed for nontraumatic chest pain |
Claims, registry | Claims: Cluster 4 Registry: none |
PQRS 76 | Patient safety | Prevention of CRBSI: central venous catheter insertion protocol |
Claims, registry | Claims: Cluster 12-anesthesiology Registry: Cluster 24-anesthesiology Can report 76 alone, not subject to MAV |
PQRS 91 | Clinical effectiveness | Acute otitis externa: topical therapy | Claims, registry | Claims: Cluster 7 Registry: Cluster 12 |
PQRS 93 | Efficiency | Acute otitis externa: systemic antimicrobial therapy—avoidance of inappropriate use | Claims, registry | Claims: Cluster 7 Registry: Cluster 12 |
PQRS 187 | Clinical effectiveness | Stroke and stroke rehabilitation: thrombolytic therapy (tPA); also known as hospital STK-4 |
Registry only | Registry Cluster: 21 Registry only |
PQRS 254 | Clinical effectiveness | Ultrasound Determination of pregnancy location for pregnant patients with abdominal pain | Claims, registry | Claims: Cluster 4 Registry: none |
PQRS 255 | Clinical effectiveness | Rh immunoglobulin (Rhogam) for Rh-negative pregnant women at risk of fetal blood exposure |
Claims, registry | Claims: Cluster 4 Registry: none |
PQRS 317 *cross cutting* |
Population and community health | Preventive care and screening: screening for high blood pressure and follow-up documented | Claims, registry | Cross-Cutting Claims and registry |
PQRS 326 | Clinical effectiveness | Atrial fibrillation and atrial flutter: chronic anticoagulation therapy; aka hospital STK-3 |
Claims, registry | Claims: none Registry: none |
Emergency Medicine and the MAV Process
- Eligible providers can still satisfy PQRS and avoid the penalty by reporting on less than nine measures, but would be subject to the MAV process to determine whether they reported on as many measures as are applicable; this will also determine if they could have reported on any cross cutting measures.
- About 99 percent of emergency providers will not have any Medicare patients that fall into measures 91, 93, 254, and 255 above, so it is highly unlikely that those measures would be counted toward the nine-measure goal for most providers.
- Emergency physicians should also beware of reporting on any measures outside of their cluster (with the exception of 76 and 317), as reporting additional measures may trigger additional clusters as noted in the table above.
- On January 19, 2015, CMS released the 2015 MAV process: Claims-based MAV for emergency care = Cluster 4 + 1 Cross-Cutting Measure
Claims-based MAV for Emergency Care
MAV cluster | PQRS Number | Reporting Mechanism | Quality Measure Title | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Cluster 4 | Emergency care | 54 | Clinical effectiveness | Emergency medicine: 12-lead electrocardiogram performed for nontraumatic chest pain |
254 | Clinical effectiveness | Ultrasound determination of pregnancy location for pregnant patients with abdominal pain | ||
255 | Clinical effectiveness | Rh immunoglobulin (Rhogam) for Rh-negative pregnant women at risk of fetal blood exposure | ||
+ | Cross-cutting | 317 | Population and community health | Preventive care and screening: screening for high blood pressure and follow-up documented |
Pages: 1 2 | Single Page
No Responses to “Meet PQRS Goals with the Measure Applicability Validation Process”