35-year-old man presents by EMS with seizures. According to family at the scene, he has a history of seizures but has not been taking his medication recently. He has been seizing for 30 minutes, despite treatment of intravenous lorazepam by EMS. On arrival, he is obtunded, foaming at the mouth, and exhibiting generalized tonic-clonic seizure activity.
Explore This Issue
ACEP Now: Vol 43 – No 07 – July 2024Clinical Question
» How should status epilepticus be diagnosed?
The diagnosis and management of status epilepticus are essential skills for emergency physicians. Should emergency physicians rely on standard textbooks for diagnostic and treatment regimens? Or should recent literature guide diagnosis and management?
Status epilepticus has previously been defined as seizure(s) greater than or equal to 30 minutes in which the patient does not regain normal mental status between seizures. Alternatively, the Neurocritical Care Society defines it as a seizure with five minutes or more of continuous clinical or EEG seizure activity, or recurrent seizure activity without recovery between seizures.1
History and physical examination have been the cornerstone of seizure diagnosis in the emergency department (ED). History taking, which relies on patient or witness accounts of the seizure event, can provide critical clues to differentiate seizures from other episodic disorders; however, its sensitivity is limited by the accuracy and completeness of the recollection, which can be affected by the patient’s postictal state or the observer’s understanding of seizure manifestations. Physical examination, including the assessment of postictal signs such as Todd’s paralysis, tongue bite marks, or loss of bladder control, offers additional diagnostic clues but also lacks specificity for seizure diagnosis.
These issues are compounded in the diagnosis of nonconvulsive seizures in critically ill patients. This subset of seizures lacks the dramatic convulsive movements typically associated with seizures, instead manifesting with either subtle clinical signs or altered mental status without any overt seizure-like activity. These seizures are detectable only with EEG monitoring and, similar to convulsive seizures, nonconvulsive seizures that are prolonged or repetitive can present a neurological emergency termed nonconvulsive status epilepticus.2 A study of routine EEG in the ED in 2013 found that five percent of ED patients with altered mental status had nonconvulsive seizures (of whom 75 percent were in nonconvulsive status epilepticus).3 A systematic review of nonconvulsive seizures and status epilepticus in the intensive care unit (ICU) reported a pooled prevalence of 15 percent using continuous EEG; however, this prevalence varied considerably according to the clinical context or underlying etiology (eight percent among patients with coma, 10 percent in sepsis, 15 percent in stroke, 23 percent post-cardiac arrest, 33–48 percent following treatment of convulsive status epilepticus).4 With the increasing utilization of EEG, especially continuous EEG, nonconvulsive seizures have been increasingly recognized and diagnosed as a cause of altered mental status in critically ill patients.
Although they may not appear as physically injurious as convulsive seizures, nonconvulsive seizures can significantly impact the neurological outcomes and overall prognosis of patients in critical care settings. Especially in the case of status epilepticus, delayed treatment can lead to a phenomenon known as pharmacoresistance, in which the effectiveness of anti-seizure medications diminishes over time due to neurobiological changes that alter drug targets (e.g., reduced surface expression of postsynaptic GABAA receptors) and drug transport mechanisms (e.g., increased expression of drug efflux transporters) to enable self-sustaining ictal rhythms.5,6 This underscores the importance of being vigilant and integrating clinical findings with advanced diagnostic tools like EEG to improve diagnostic accuracy for seizures and refine the management of critically ill patients to ensure comprehensive neurological care.7
Several studies have demonstrated the importance of EEG monitoring in the management of seizures.8–11 Although continuous EEG monitoring would be the gold standard for diagnosing and managing nonconvulsive seizures, it is either unavailable or delayed at many centers, and it is rarely performed in the ED. This is because conventional EEG requires a large machine, a qualified technologist, and a significant amount of time for setup, and the output data must be reviewed and interpreted by a neurologist. Some institutions have the capability to perform real-time EEG monitoring and interpretation by a neurologist in the ED. Other devices have demonstrated potential use as an alternative to traditional EEG monitoring. For example, other modes of EEG monitoring may be used in the operative setting, including bispectral index monitoring (BIS) and SEDline device, to monitor depth of sedation.12 A point-of-care (POC) EEG system has been developed to provide real-time EEG data.13 Preliminary data suggest that among 157 adult patients, POC EEG enabled acquisition of EEG data within 90 minutes of ED arrival, identified epileptiform activity in 36 percent of patients, and impacted treatment decisions.14 Future research is needed to determine the sensitivity and specificity of this device, particularly in the ED environment, where patients may have taken medications or recreational drugs, or may have received sedative or antiepileptic medications.
Diagnostic studies useful in determining the etiology may include POC glucose, serum electrolytes, and complete blood count. Other considerations dependent on the clinical setting and history may include CT scan, MRI, or lumbar puncture.
Management of status epilepticus includes stabilization of airway, breathing, and circulation. If a patient is obtunded or unable to protect the airway, endotracheal intubation is indicated. Following stabilization, pharmacologic therapy should be initiated with first-line therapy of a benzodiazepine, such as lorazepam. Appropriate dosing is associated with seizure termination and reduced complications.15-17 Anti-epileptic medication may be administered concurrently, such as fosphenytoin, phenytoin, levetiracetam, or valproic acid.18–21 Refractory status epilepticus may be treated with a continuous infusion of an antiepileptic medication, such as propofol, ketamine, midazolam, or pentobarbital.
Consultation with neurology should be sought to guide therapy. Patients with status epilepticus require hospital admission, often to an intensive care setting.
Case Conclusion
Following stabilization of airway, breathing, and circulation, antiepileptic therapy is indicated. This patient has already received first-line treatment with a benzodiazepine. Specific antiepileptic therapy should be initiated with another agent, such as fosphenytoin, phenytoin, levetiracetam, or valproic acid. Neurology consultation should be initiated, and the patient should be admitted to the ICU.
Disclaimer
This article is not a comprehensive review of diagnosis and treatment of status epilepticus but an overview of management and future directions. Authoritative sources should be used for diagnostic and treatment decisions.
References
- Brophy GM, Bell R, Claassen J, et al. Neurocritical Care Society Status Epilepticus Guideline Writing Committee. Guidelines for the evaluation and management of status epilepticus. Neurocrit Care. 2012;17(1):3-23.
- Sutter R, Rüegg S, Kaplan PW. Epidemiology, diagnosis, and management of nonconvulsive status epilepticus: Opening Pandora’s box. Neurol Clin Pract. 2012;2(4):275-286.
- Zehtabchi S, Abdel Baki SG, Omurtag A, et al. Prevalence of non-convulsive seizure and other electroencephalographic abnormalities in ED patients with altered mental status. Am J Emerg Med. 2013;31(11):1578-1582.
- Towne AR, Waterhouse EJ, Boggs JG, et al. Prevalence of nonconvulsive status epilepticus in comatose patients. Neurology. 2000;54(2):340-345.
- Chen JWY, Wasterlain CG. Status epilepticus: pathophysiology and management in adults. Lancet Neurol. 2006;5(3):246-256.
- Betjemann JP, Lowenstein DH. Status epilepticus in adults. Lancet Neurol. 2015;14(6):615-624.
- Huff JS, Melnick ER, Tomaszewski CA, et al. Clinical policy: critical issues in the evaluation and management of adult patients presenting to the emergency department with seizures. Ann Emerg Med. 2014;63(4):437-447.
- Gunawardena S, Chikkannaiah M, Stolfi A, et al. Utility of electroencephalogram in the pediatric emergency department. Am J Emerg Med. 2022;54:26-29.
- Paliwal P, Wakerley BR, Yeo LLL, et al. Early electroencephalography in patients with emergency room diagnoses of suspected new-onset seizures: diagnostic yield and impact on clinical decision-making. Seizure. 2015;31:22-26.
- Rodríguez Quintana JH, Bueno SJ, Zuleta-Motta JL, et al. The Neuroscience Research Group (NeuRos). Utility of routine EEG in emergency department and inpatient service. Neurol Clin Pract. 2021;11(5):e677-e681.
- Prud‘hon S, Amiel H, Zanin A, et al. EEG and acute confusional state at the emergency department. Neurophysiol Clin. 2024;54(4):102966.
- Froese L, Dian J, Gomez A, et al. Association between processed electroencephalogram-based objectively measured depth of sedation and cerebrovascular response: a systematic scoping overview of the human and animal literature. Front Neurol. 2021;12:692207.
- Kamousi B, Karunakaran S, Gururangan K, et al. Monitoring the burden of seizures and highly epileptiform patterns in critical care with a novel machine learning method. Neurocrit Care. 2021;34(3):908-917.
- Kozak R, Gururangan K, Dorriz PJ, et al. Point-of-care electroencephalography enables rapid evaluation and management of non-convulsive seizures and status epilepticus in the emergency department. J Am Coll Emerg Physicians Open. 2023;4(4):e13004.
- Jindal M, Neligan A, Rajakulendran S. Early and established status epilepticus: the impact of timing of intervention, treatment escalation and dosing on outcome. Seizure. 2023;111:98-102.
- Sathe AG, Underwood E, Coles LD, et al. Patterns of benzodiazepine underdosing in the Established Status Epilepticus Treatment Trial. Epilepsia. 2021;62(3):795-806.
- Braun KRM, Pham LL, Wall GC, et al. Suboptimal dosing of benzodiazepines and levetiracetam in a cohort of status epilepticus patients and outcomes associated with inadequate dosing. J Pharm Pract. 2023;36(5):1068-1071.
- American College of Emergency Physicians. Seizure. April 2024. Accessed June 17, 2024.
- American College of Emergency Physicians. Clinical Policy: Critical Issues in the Management of Adult Patients Presenting to the Emergency Department with Seizures. https://www.acep.org/siteassets/newpdfs/clinical-policies/seizures-2024-final.pdf. April 17, 2024. Accessed 4/30/2024.
- Kapur J, Elm J, Chamberlain JM, et al. Randomized trial of three anticonvulsant medications for status 327 epilepticus. N Engl J Med. 2019;381(22):2103-2113.
- Chamberlain JM, Kapur J, Shinnar S, et al. Efficacy of levetiracetam, fosphenytoin, and valproate for 330 established status epilepticus by age group (ESETT): a double-blind, responsive-adaptive, randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2020;395(10231):1217-1224.
Pages: 1 2 3 4 | Multi-Page
One Response to “The Current Status of Continuous-Seizure Management”
July 30, 2024
Scott Weiner, MD, MPHI appreciate this article, and this is by no means meant to be a personal attack or discrediting the validity of the information contained in the article. I consult for a pharma company and disclose it whenever I speak or write about something related to that work. In this case, the Open Payments website shows that one of the authors has received over $128,000 from Ceribell, a company that makes a POC EEG system (https://openpaymentsdata.cms.gov/physician/803367). I do not discourage this type of consulting, as I believe it is important for knowledgeable physicians to inform device manufacturers and pharma companies, but I respectfully request that ACEPNow include such disclosures within its articles so readers can be aware of potential biases.